Instruction to authors

Objective

African Chronicles research publication journals (ACRP Journals) is driven by need of transparent standards in reporting and ongoing exigencies of publication platform for the numerous higher degree researchers (HDR) in Africa. Hence, the African Chronicles research publication journals will be focused on serving HDR students in Africa including overseas’ students whose projects are either domiciled in Africa or involve Africans as major research participants. The ACRP journals also welcome research reports from undergraduates and Honours students as well as research Term Papers in forms of either critical appraisal or perspective-in-practice.

Types of articles

  1. Original research report (≥3 specific objectives)
  2. Short research report (≤2 objectives)
  3. Review articles
    1. Systematic
    2. Narrative
    3. Critical appraisal
  4. Perspective in practice
  5. Proposal and protocol (see template to note the difference)
    1. Proposal
    2. Protocols

Further information on the specifications for each type of article, see table 1: Article types and their specifications.

Manuscript submission

Manuscripts must be submitted:

Manuscript formatting

See templates and select the most appropriate from table 1: Article types and their specifications. For original research reports, detailed study design is required. See table 2: Research design considerations for clues.

All manuscripts must be written in English language, British spelling.

Graphical (figures and tables) presentation of statistical results should be done with excel and presented in editable format.

References & referencing

APA, and the reference list must include complete/direct URL. References to sources without URL should be consciously minimized to absolute necessity and a maximum two.

 

Table 1: Article types and their specifications

Types

Article subtype

Basic standard

Format

Abstract limit

Graphics

Refs

Peer-review (JBI std)

Original research report

Short report

≤ 2 specific objectives

Template 1

200 words

4

25

CASP checklist or JBI

Full length

≥ 3 specific objectives

300 words

6

50

Review article

Systematic review

Prisma chart

Template 2

JBI ‘SR’

Narrative review

SANRA table

Template 3

SANRA scale or JBI ‘NR’

Critical appraisal

Referenced standard

Template 4

200 words

3

20

CASP or JBI qualitative

Perspectives in practice

Case report (health, only)

CARE//JBI checklist

CARE checklist or JBI

Viewpoint

Expert opinion

JBI ‘expert opinion’

Proposal or protocol

Proposal

 

 

150

4

15

 

Protocol

 

 

 

Keys:

*Introduction to conclusion, only; Figures and/or tables; Details required for study design

SR: systematic review, NR: narrative review

Checklists: CARE case report (Riley & IMI LLC, 2013; Riley et al., 2017), CASP (CASP UK – OAP Ltd, 2024), JBI (JBI, 2024), and SANRA (Baethge et al., 2019)

 

Table 2: Research design considerations

Subsection

Design 1

Design 2

Design 3

Design 4

Design 5

Population study type

Pilot

Cross-sectional

Retrospective

Prospective

Intervention

Sampling method

Convenience sampling

Random sampling

Quota & systematic

Random & stratified

Randomization

Data types

Focus group discussion

Survey closed-ended

Numerical: continuous

Numerical: interval

Likert scaled survey

Statistical analysis

Thematic

Descriptive analysis

Regression analysis

MANOVA

ANOVA

 

Declarations

Acknowledgements:

Conflict of interest:

Data repository (University base):

Funding:

Professional editing:

Reference list examples

Baethge, C., Goldbeck-Wood, S., & Mertens, S. (2019). SANRA-a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles. Res Integr Peer Rev, 4, 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-019-0064-8

CASP UK – OAP Ltd. (2024). Critical appraisal checklists. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. Retrieved 24th May, 2024 from https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/

JBI. (2024). Critical appraisal tools. Retrieved 24th May, 2024 from https://jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools

Riley, D., & IMI LLC. (2013). 2013 CARE Checklist. CARE case report guidelines. Retrieved 24th May, 2024 from https://www.care-statement.org/checklist

Riley, D. S., Barber, M. S., Kienle, G. S., Aronson, J. K., von Schoen-Angerer, T., Tugwell, P., Kiene, H., Helfand, M., Altman, D. G., Sox, H., Werthmann, P. G., Moher, D., Rison, R. A., Shamseer, L., Koch, C. A., Sun, G. H., Hanaway, P., Sudak, N. L., Kaszkin-Bettag, M., . . . Gagnier, J. J. (2017). CARE guidelines for case reports: explanation and elaboration document. J Clin Epidemiol, 89, 218-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.04.026

Peer-review process

The ACRP journals will perform a rigorous unbiased peer-review for every article by in two ways:

  1. Using standard forms
  2. Engaging at least 2 reviewers including a mix of both academic and practitioner.

Authors are required to suggested at least two reviewers including a mix if one practitioner and one academic. Where there is apparent disagreement between the two reviewers, a member of Editorial board will be invited as arbiter.